🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document offers a flawed view of Europe. It claims that unrestrained immigration and what it terms "progressive" policies pose an existential risk to the continent's identity. However, this argument rests on a fundamental misreading of the situation. The true danger facing the EU is not societal but economic and technological backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Gap Between Europe and the US

The data reveal a stark picture. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by 87%, compared to a mere thirteen and a half percent increase for the European Union. Over this period, European income per person fell from 76.5% to just 50% of the American figure. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now has a greater average income than several leading European economies like Italy and France.

Currently, about 50% of the world’s 50 largest tech companies are American, while a mere four are European.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Question

The growing economic gap is driven by superior productivity growth in the United States, largely due to breakthroughs and better use of resources. The landscape of global tech dominance is decidedly US-centric. In the last five decades, 241 US firms have scaled into companies valued at over ten billion dollars, versus just 14 in the European continent.

This disparity raises a pressing question: In the race for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, what is Europe stand? Most analysts concede it is essentially a two-horse race involving the US and China, with European nations starting at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of the Continent's Innovation Gap

Several major factors account for this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a much more robust and more dynamic system for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a genuine unified investment market, a factor that caps the growth potential of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Excessive and fragmented rules hamper Europe. A US startup can launch a service under one set of laws to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a bigger population, is divided among 27 separate regimes, creating huge internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In some EU nations, business failure was historically met with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's long-term lack of spending in defense has weakened its ability in breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, there are causes for optimism. European leaders are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have begun to advance substantial change. Key reports on European competitiveness and the internal market point to the necessity of major reforms.

Given appropriate policies and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths could support far greater degrees of commercial innovation.

The continent still possesses considerable strengths: skilled workforce, top-tier schools and universities, and premier research institutions. Coupled with a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these elements have the potential to trigger a new wave of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if the EU does not become the leader in creating next-generation technologies, it can still dramatically boost productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

Europe now faces a decisive crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, the continent's technological decline has been steady. But, without decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could turn into a sudden and irreversible decline in global economic relevance.